Let’s talk about it.
I mean…”It”. “It” was a
best-selling novel by horror guru Stephen King which hit the shelves in 1986
and was spun into a very well-known miniseries in 1990 on ABC, and this is
where the concept of “It” became ingrained in the consciousness of American
horror fans. I remember watching "It" air
back in 1990 and it quickly became a Halloween staple for the station for years
to come. The miniseries explored the
interpersonal relationships amongst preteens as they dealt with a supernatural
nightmare that was threatening their hometown.
The story is actually split into two parts, with one half told as flashback
to the time when the main characters were children fighting off the monster,
and into their adult lives as the monster comes back once again to threaten
them.
Already I can tell my grammar checking software is going to hate this piece.
I’m explaining all this to you because in 2017 we are due to
get a remake of “It”. This of course
will include a brand new version of the central character of the film,
Pennywise the Dancing Clown. Even the
most casual horror fans will recognize this infamous nightmare, originally
brought to life by Tim Curry for the miniseries, and the knee jerk reaction
will be that there is no way anyone could compare to Curry’s performance.
This isn’t without precedence because Curry has always been
an A list performer, a living legend in cult classics, and he’s going to naturally be very difficult to top. What compounds the problem is that most people
saw “It” originally when they were very young.
The show came out 26 years ago and the people who grew up watching Curry’s
Pennywise will have that performance firmly implanted in their brain boarded up
with only the most impenetrable of nostalgic feelings.
Now, as of this writing I have not found an actual trailer
for the upcoming 2017 version. I’ve only
seen the promotional material circulated by Entertainment Weekly of Bill Skarsgård
as Pennywise.
Judge for yourself
Both the original television series and the book state that
It has been terrorizing the citizens of Derry, Maine for generations, arriving
on earth in that spot prior to colonists coming over from Europe. Somewhere along the way, It decided that its prey
of choice would be children and somewhere along its time on earth adopted the
form of Pennywise the Clown, among numerous other disguises. Now I did
some digging to see if there was some historical significance to the form of the clown, even
reaching out to my best friend and Stephen King expert, William Dilbeck. Is there some in-story historical
significance to the clown?
“No, not really, but the clown is memorable. Mike Hanlon never left Derry, and he collects
stories from the old people in town. In
one of these stories, this old man talks about how this gang gets shot to death
in the middle of town, and he remembers seeing this clown floating just outside
a window, taking pot shots at the gang with a rifle.”
He went on to point out “The clown might represent It’s
sinister intent, and well, it never hurts to have an iconic look. It mostly hunts children, though, and I
believe that it uses this as his camouflage.”
Thanks Will.
So it seems Stephen King may have had the famous quote from Lon Chaney in mind when writing Pennywise "There's nothing funny about a clown in the moonlight."
That kind of brings us back around to the design of
Pennywise for both the television series and the film. I’ll do a side by side.
Designers discussed that the look of the costume is very
much inspired by the renaissance period, indicating that It’s knowledge of
human events extends far outside Derry, Maine even if It can’t influence those
events. One would think that if It could
extend its influential reach beyond the confines of Derry, It would be far more
powerful.
The overall weathered, otherworldly appearance of the 2017
Pennywise costume also makes it stand out apart from characters like Jared Leto’s
and Heath Ledger’s respective Jokers, as well as the multitude of clowns
featured in Rob Zombie’s horror films.
No, this Pennywise definitely stands out, even against his 1990’s
counterpart.
Curry’s rendition of the character was far more in keeping
with modern interpretations of clowns, with a baggy, brightly colored full body
suit, white fluffy ruffles, and outwardly pleasant demeanor, which would later
give way to It’s predatory nature. The
2017 version on the other hand immediately comes across as threatening and
unsettling and I can’t imagine this being an effective lure for anyone. Even people without a crippling fear of
clowns would be sent screaming into the hills if they saw that coming at them.
But on the flip side, Tim Curry’s Pennywise can be equally
unsettling not strictly by how he looks but more about where you see him. You see him in the drainage gutters, in the
woods, in boiler rooms, outside windows, in places that you aren't supposed to
see clowns. If you saw a clown at a
circus or a birthday party, that’s one thing.
You’re technically supposed to see clowns there. If you see a clown standing across the
street, no matter how nice he looks, he’s not supposed to be there and that
makes him automatically threatening,
more so if he starts beckoning you over.
So does the 2017 version work? Well that greatly depends on what they do with
him. Are there going to be scenes where
he looks more cleaned up, less threatening, or is he always going to look like
he hitchhiked across state lines? The
reason I ask is because if there is a dichotomy in his look, clean giving way
to sinister, then that allows a lot more freedom in how effective he can be as
a horror icon. If he’s always going to
look like that, then he’s going to lose his effectiveness very quickly.
Either way “It” is going to hit theatres in September of 2017 so let’s
hope it lives up to the legacy set down by the original.
Thank you for reading and thank you Will for your input in
today’s post. Please check out his book
series, and have a great day.
Also, to my knowledge, this movie (or movies, if you believe the rumors) is supposed to be getting a hard R rating. This may not make the movie any more frightening, but will most certainly have more gore.
ReplyDeleteI have high hopes for this adaptation. However, as Netflix has shown us, something of this caliber could be equally good on the small screen. Stranger Things is a fine example of this!